E–pub Digital Copyright Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet

  • Kindle Edition
  • 216
  • Digital Copyright Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet
  • Jessica Litman
  • en
  • 01 November 2018
  • null

Jessica Litman Ä 9 Read & download

Characters ì Digital Copyright Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet That reflect common sense and the way people actually behave in their daily digital interactions This paperback edition includes an afterword that comments on recent developments such as the end of the Napster story the rise of peer to peer file sharing the escalation of a full fledged copyright war the filing of lawsuits against thousands of individuals and the June 2005 Supreme Court decision in the Grokster case. This is an important and detailed introduction to the current legal issues with Copyright I personally didn t like Litman s collouial style but its definitely much accessible that most other texts in this genre

Download Digital Copyright Protecting Intellectual Property on the InternetDigital Copyright Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet

Characters ì Digital Copyright Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet In 1998 copyright lobbyists succeeded in persuading Congress to enact laws greatly expanding copyright owners' control over individuals' private uses of their works The efforts to enforce these new rights have resulted in highly publicized legal battles between established media and new upstarts In this enlightening and well argued book law professor Jessica Litman uestions whether copyright laws crafted by lawyers. A terrific little general audiences book on how copyright law gets made and the follies of the Napster era process Regardless of your political views it s hard to come away from this book feeling anything other than despair and disgust towards the American political processLitman s a sharp eyed analyst and critic and always readable The only flaw of this book is that it was assembled from previously published articles and tends towards repetition of key passage This seems to be a flaw of short academic books in particular for some reason perhaps to make minimum page countNonetheless Digital Copyright is a uick and entertaining read not an elucidation of the law but of the process by which copyright laws have been made for the past century and a critiue of the follies it s led us to

Download ↠ E-book, or Kindle E-pub Ä Jessica Litman

Characters ì Digital Copyright Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet And their lobbyists really make sense for the vast majority of us Should every interaction between ordinary consumers and copyright protected works be restricted by law Is it practical to enforce such laws or expect consumers to obey them What are the effects of such laws on the exchange of information in a free society Litman's critiue exposes the 1998 copyright law as an incoherent patchwork She argues for reforms. A discussion of copyright issues in the digital era This is a very good but depressing book Of special interest is the way Littman describes the point of view of the other side I m presuming you are primarily a consumer of copyrighted works and not a content company or a lawyer who represents same and the reasons why the process which creates copyright legislation almost always neglects the consumer ie the readerwatcherlisteneretc Try googling on copyright issues for information Erzulie's Skirt protected works be restricted by law Is it When You Wish practical to enforce such laws or expect consumers to obey them What are the effects of such laws on the exchange of information in a free society Litman's critiue exposes the 1998 copyright law as an incoherent Falconis Tractor patchwork She argues for reforms. A discussion of copyright issues in the digital era This is a very good but depressing book Of special interest is the way Littman describes the Paisaje de Otoño point of view of the other side I m Eksyneen muistikirja presuming you are Afternoons with the Blinds Drawn primarily a consumer of copyrighted works and not a content company or a lawyer who represents same and the reasons why the